48 Reviews of Fat-free Chewy Chocolate Cookies

From: sugarpea

On Jul 29, 2004

Hallelujah! 55 calorie cookies!! 55 calorie CHOCOLATE cookies!!! Now, they're not butter-laden, gooey chocolate brownies but they ARE good and satisfyingly chocolaty. I subbed Splenda and thought it worked just fine. I, too, thought they were better after cooling.

From: BigFatMomma

On May 27, 2005

It's a good thing I can type and chew at the same time, or I'd never have reviewed these! To make mine a bit healthier, I used whole-wheat pastry flour and evaporated cane juice, and they were great. They were dry, but I put them in a ziploc while still warm, and that made them perfect. Thank you so much for contributing to the not-so-delinquency of a cookie fiend!!

From: tatumis

On May 24, 2004

Uber-yummy. thanks so much for passing the recipe along. the batter seemed dry at first, but i kept stirring and they came out beautifully. I used 1/2 cup whole wheat flour and 1 cup white. delish.

From: Philamom

On Jul 7, 2007

These were great, especially for the calorie and fat counts. I did at a splash of water just to thin the mix out a bit. My kids even loved them

From: lawohl

On May 21, 2006

These are very tasty! I made them with whole wheat-whole grain flour and splenda, which brought them down to 1/2 point each. Hubby said they taste more like a chocolate muffin than a cookie. I have to agree.

From: KCShell

On Oct 17, 2005

I used a 1 tsp. scoop, rolled them in sugar and baked them on a baking stone. I baked them for 9 minutes. They were done on the outside but still soft on the inside. They taste wonderful right out of the oven! Thanks, Kree for giving me an incredible fat free, dairy free cookie!

From: justcallmetoni

On May 20, 2006

I went back and forth on whether to rate these a 4 or 5. They were quite tasty with a dry exterier and a fudgy brownie like interior. Mine were a bit smaller - about 3 dozen - which made the 3 for 2 points, a deal for WW folks. My challenge here was the dough was really quite dry and hard to handle. I eventally gave up on mixing them with a spoon and turned the dough by hand. It did evenually soften and was even sticky by the time I finished. Next time I will let them sit a minute or so before trying to mix. They are not sweet which was fine for me but the family thought they needed more sugar. All that said, they are definite keepers for satisfying that chocolate craving without feeling the slightest bit guilty. Thanks Kree.

From: cindy6250

On May 17, 2005

Great recipe. The cookies are moist and chocolatey, not too sweet. Very good. I made 3 dozen cookies from the dough. They were a little smaller, but only 31 calories each.

From: GingerPeach

On May 1, 2005

These are surprisingly good. I baked two trays of cookies, the first one for about 7 minutes and the 2nd one for 9-10. The 7 minute cookies were still slightly gooey when I took them out, and they turned out great. The others were starting to taste more bread-like. But after storing them in a tupperware container overnight they all tasted moist and good. The only thing I would change would be a touch more sugar (and I'm not a sugar fiend).

From: Bev. E.

On May 4, 2004

These are the best little cookie. Thanks for posting. The recipe is very easy to make, it tastes like chewy rich chocolate brownie, I had a couple with fresh strawberries and blueberries. Nice treat when watching your intake of calories.